Logo

American Security Council Foundation

Back to main site

Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Bi-partisan Tech Bill to Protect US Interests Stalls in the House

Wednesday, November 24, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/bi-partisan-tech-bill-to-protect-us-interests-stalls-in-the-house_4114574.html?utm_source=hot_topics_rec&utm_medium=frnt_top

File photo of a silicon wafer on display on March 23, 2011 in San Jose, California on March 23, 2011. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

A comprehensive bill to boost American science and technology⁠ to compete with China’s growing economic power and global influence, particularly regarding semiconductors capacity, has been stalled in the House of Representatives, after being passed by the Senate in June. As a result, proponents are looking for alternatives to turn it into legislation.

The U.S. Innovation and Competition Act (USICA) of 2021 would authorize $190 billion in spending for scientific research and development and $52 billion in funding to boost semiconductor production in the United States. The bill further includes measures to defend friendly foreign semiconductor producers.

However, some representatives claim they prefer to draft their own bill, rather than pass USICA. At the same time, sources told Reuters that China has been pressuring U.S. executives, companies, and business groups to lobby against USICA and other similar bills.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) proposed USICA (pdf) on May 18, which the Senate passed with 68–32 bipartisan support in June.

Yet as the end of the year approaches, it becomes less probable for USICA to be approved before 2022.

In response, backers are trying to introduce some of the bill’s provisions in other pieces of legislation, like the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), that will pass before the end of the year.

Schumer mentioned the possibility of including USICA’s text in the NDAA in a letter on Sunday. He said this “would enable a USICA negotiation with the House to be completed alongside NDAA before the end of the year.”

According to experts, expanding semiconductors capacity constitutes a National Defense issue. Epoch Times contributor Antonio Graceffo wrote that the chips are necessary components for military and defense devices, telecommunications, missile guidance and navigation systems; as well as weapons simulators, range finding devices, and proximity fuses. Semiconductors also play a significant part in countries’ economies, as they are essential to building commercial technological devices.

For example, Taiwan produces about 63 percent of the world’s semiconductors, according to the European Institute for Asian Studies.

As semiconductors are crucial to China’s developmental ambitions, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been threatening to take over Taiwan, despite the latter being a self-governed democracy.

According to James Gorrie, author of the China Crisis, if the CCP acquires the island-nation’s manufacturing capability, it would put the CCP at a significant advantage and might put other countries’ security at risk. This will be a result of most nations’ AI and 5G banking on these chips, he said in an Epoch Times online webinar on Oct. 27.

USICA has many provisions that strongly defend Taiwan’s independence. For instance, it calls on the United States to “advocate and actively advance Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the United Nations.” It also asserts the United States must “strenuously oppose any action by the People’s Republic of China to use force to change the status quo of Taiwan.”

When the Senate was about to vote on the bill, Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, introduced similar legislation to the House, but with a softened approach to Taiwan and human rights issues. The Bill is called the “Ensuring American Global Leadership and Engagement,” or EAGLE Act (pdf).

Analysis by The Epoch Times showed that several sections of USICA that detailed the U.S. response to China’s aggression against Taiwan in the Senate bill had been either removed or altered in the EAGLE Act. This caused concern among House Republicans, who called for a tougher approach when dealing with the CCP.

“We need to come together in a bipartisan manner to respond with tough legislation that holds the CCP accountable for its aggression toward its neighbors and its abuses at home,” Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) told The Epoch Times in June.

Michael McCaul, the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said “It is critical Congress pass strong, bipartisan legislation to address the generational threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party.”

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.