Logo

American Security Council Foundation

Back to main site

Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

China’s ‘Breathtaking’ Pace in Military Modernization Poses Serious Threat to US, Admiral Says

Monday, August 16, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinas-breathtaking-pace-in-military-modernization-poses-serious-threat-to-us-admiral-says_3947237.html

Military vehicles carrying DF-5B intercontinental ballistic missiles participate in a military parade at Tiananmen Square in Beijing on Oct. 1, 2019. (Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images)

The commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, which oversees the country’s nuclear arsenal, has given a dire warning about China’s rapidly increasing military capability.

“We are witnessing a strategic breakout by China. The explosive growth and modernization of its nuclear and conventional forces can only be what I describe as breathtaking,” Adm. Charles Richard said on Aug. 12. “Business as usual will not work.

“Make no mistake; China’s strategic breakout is cause for action.”

Richard made the remark during a speech at the Space and Missile Defense Symposium in Alabama on Aug. 12. He emphasized that he didn’t use the term “strategic breakout” lightly.

He cautioned against simply judging Beijing’s capability based on the difference in nuclear stockpile size between China and the United States. It also doesn’t matter why the Chinese regime is modernizing its forces, he added.

“What matters is they are building the capability to execute any plausible nuclear employment strategy, the last brick in the wall of a military capable of coercion,” Richard said.

Some of China’s growing nuclear and missile capacity includes intermediate-range ballistic missiles, road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), and submarine-launched nuclear ballistic missiles, according to Richard. Additionally, he also warned about China’s hypersonic missiles, and how the current U.S. defense system “may not be sufficient to detect and track them.”

“In 2019, the PRC [People’s Republic of China] test-launched more ballistic missiles than the rest of the world combined,” he said.

Beijing’s military build-up also includes the construction of over 200 new ICBM silos, Richard said, pointing to discoveries made by the Federation of American Scientists and the California-based James Martin Center through commercial satellite images in recent months. The new silos are being built at two separate fields in China’s far-western region of Xinjiang and the neighboring Gansu Province.

“China has an active nuclear weapons testing program,” Richard said, pointing to a new tunnel being built at China’s nuclear testing site known as Lop Nur, which is in southern Xinjiang.

Construction of the new tunnel was reported by NPR on July 30, based on satellite-image analysis done by the Colorado-based geospatial research firm AllSource Analysis.

“You add all this up and what you get is something that is inconsistent with a minimum deterrence posture,” Richard said, referring to China’s decades-old public stance on keeping its nuclear stockpile to the minimum level necessary to deter nuclear threats.

Fu Cong, director-general of the Department of Arms Control at China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, repeated the regime’s claims about its commitment to “minimum deterrence” during the annual EU Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Conference last November.

However, the CCP’s actions “have long belied a posture more aggressive than their official policy,” Richard said.

“You’ve got to look at what they do, not what they say,” he said. “The breathtaking growth in strategic nuclear capability enables China to change their posture and their strategy.”

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken offered a similar conclusion early this month, when he said the Chinese regime “has deviated” from its own policy, given the “rapid growth” of its nuclear arsenal.

On Aug. 7, a day after Blinken expressed his concerns, Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief of China’s hawkish state-run media Global Times, wrote that Beijing’s minimum deterrence was “now different from the past” because of what he perceived “strategic threat” from the United States.

“The stronger China’s nuclear forces are, the more it is guaranteed that the U.S. will not do something silly,” Hu wrote.

Now, the United States faces an unprecedented challenge posed by Russia and China, Richard said.

“For the first time in our nation’s history, we are facing two peer nuclear-capable potential adversaries at the same time, who have to be deterred differently,” he said, adding that the two nations “wish to change the world order.”

To deter the threats posed by Russia and China, Richard said the United States must continue to modernize its nuclear force, bolster its missile defense system, and put effort into developing advanced weapons such as high-energy lasers.

“Our current and planned terrestrial-based radar architecture limits our capability to fully achieve early warning,” he said.

“We need a 21st-century warning or we’re going to have to go put our forces in a different posture to account for our lack of warning.”

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.