Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Fmr. CENTCOM Head: ‘I Would Have Preferred to Hold Bagram’

Thursday, August 18, 2022

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Source: https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/08/18/fmr-centcom-head-i-would-have-preferred-to-hold-bagram/

CENTCOM Commander Gen. Frank McKenzie (Ret.)

During portions of an interview with NBC released on Wednesday’s edition of NBC News’ “Hallie Jackson Now,” former CENTCOM Commander Gen. Frank McKenzie (Ret.), who helped oversee the evacuation of Afghanistan, said that he would have preferred if the United States kept possession of Bagram Air Base with the around 2,500 troops it would have taken to do so.

McKenzie said, “I felt, very strongly, that we had the ability to keep a platform in Afghanistan at about 2,500.”

McKenzie stated, “I would have preferred to hold Bagram at 2,500, but that’s what it would have taken, and that would also assume the Afghans would stand and fight with you. And we thought the Afghans would stand and fight with us at 2,500.”

McKenzie stated, “I would have preferred to hold Bagram at 2,500, but that’s what it would have taken, and that would also assume the Afghans would stand and fight with you. And we thought the Afghans would stand and fight with us at 2,500.”

Comments

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.